Thursday, 16 January 2014

“ወሬ አይደለም፤ አገር ቤት አንገባለን” ሌንጮ ለታ

ውጭ ጉዳይ ሚኒስቴር፤ “መረጃ የለኝም”
odf lencho


የኦሮሞ ነጻ አውጪ ግንባር ከፍተኛ አመራርና ጸሐፊ የነበሩት አቶ ሌንጮ ለታ አዲስ ያቋቋሙትን ድርጅት ይዘው አዲስ አበባ እንደሚገቡ አስረግጠው ተናገሩ። አቶ ሌንጮ ድርጅታቸው ኢትዮጵያ ገብቶ ለመታገል መወሰኑ ለምን ወሬ እንደሚባል እንዳልገባቸውም አመላክተዋል። በሰላማዊ መንገድ ለመታገል ኢትዮጵያ መግባታቸውን ኦነግ እንደሚቀበለው ተጠይቀው “ኦነግን ጠይቅ” በሚል ጠበቅ ያለ መልስ ሰንዝረዋል። የውጭ ጉዳይ ሚኒስቴር መረጃ እንደሌለው አመልክቷል።
ጥር 5 ቀን ከጀርመን ድምጽ የአማርኛ ፕሮግራም ጋር ቃለ ምልልስ ያደረጉት አቶ ሌንጮ “ኖርዌይ ተቀምጠን ምን እናደርጋለን? ሃገር ቤት ገብተን እንታገላለን” ሲሉ ወደ አገር ቤት ለመመለስ መወሰናቸውን ግልጽ አድርገዋል። “ይሳካል?” በማለት ጠያቂው ላቀረበው “ይሳካል አይሳካም ተብሎ ወደ ትግል አይገባም” በማለት አቶ ሌንጮ ማምረራቸውን በሚያሳብቅ ሁኔታ መልስ ሰጥተዋል።
ህወሃት የዘረጋውን የፌዴራል ሲስተም እንደሚቀበሉትና የኦሮሞ ህዝቦች ጥያቄም በዚያው ውስጥ ሊመለስ እንደሚችል ያመለከቱት አቶ ሌንጮ፣ “በታሪክ፣ በባህል፣ በቋንቋ የተመሰረተ ሳይሆን በህግና በህገመንግሥት በተደነገገ የህዝቦች አንድነት እናምናለን” ብለዋል። የግለሰብ መብት ከብሔር መብት መቅደም አለበት፣ የብሔር መብት አስቀድሞ ሊከበር ይገባዋል በሚል ሁለት አቋም ከሚያራምዱት የተለየ ፕሮግራም እንዳላቸውም አቶ ሌንጮ አስታውቀዋል። የግለሰብም ሆነ የቡድን መብት መከበር አለበት የሚል ፕሮግራም ያለው አዲሱ ድርጅታቸው በዚህ አቋሙ ከሌሎች እንደሚለይ አመልክተዋል።
በምርጫ የመሳተፍን ጉዳይ አስመልክቶ የእሳቸው ድርጅት ብቻ ሳይሆን ሁሉም ተቃዋሚ ሃይሎች ወደ ምርጫ ቢገቡ ፍላጎታቸው መሆኑንን አቶ ሌንጮ ተናግረዋል። ይሁን እንጂ ከምርጫ በፊት ብዙ ጥያቄዎች እንዳሉ አመልክተዋል። ዴሞክራሲን ኢትዮጵያ ውስጥ ለማስፋፈት ምርጫ ብቻውን መፍትሔ እንዳልሆነም ጠቁመዋል። ህዝብን አገር ቤት ገብቶ ማስተማር፣ መቀስቀስና ማብቃት በዋናነት አስፈላጊ እንደሆነም አስምረውበታል።
ከኢህአዴግ ጋር ድርድር ስለማድረጋቸው ለተጠየቁት፣ እስካሁን የተደረገ ድርድር እንደሌለ አቶ ሌንጮ ጠቁመዋል። አያይዘውም ከኢህአዴግ ጋር ብቻ ሳይሆን ከተቃዋሚ ድርጅቶች ጋርም የመደራደር እቅድ እንዳላቸው አመልክተዋል። አቶ ሌንጮ በተደጋጋሚ አገር ቤት መሄዳቸው መገለጹንም በማንሳት አስተባብለውታል። አቶ ሌንጮ ድርድር ስለመደረጉ ባያምኑም በተለያዩ ጊዜያት በኖርዌይና በተለያዩ አገራት ከኢህአዴግ መልዕክተኞች ጋር አሁን ይፋ ባደረጉት ጉዳይ ዙሪያ መነጋገራቸው መዘገቡ ይታወሳል። ጎልጉል የድረገጽ ጋዜጣም በቅርቡ ኢህአዴግ ብሔር ተኮር ከሆኑ ድርጅቶች ጋር ድርድር እያደረገ መሆኑንና ከሌሎች ማናቸውም ፓርቲዎች ጋር ለመደራደር ሃሳብ እንደሌለው ምንጮቹን ጠቅሶ መዘገቡይታወሳል።
አቶ ሌንጮ የሚመሩት ድርጅት ወደ ኢትዮጵያ ለመግባት መወሰኑን አስመልክቶ የውጭ ጉዳይ ሚኒስትር ቃል አቀባይ የሆኑት አቶ ዲና ሙፍቲ “መረጃ የለኝም፤ የድርጅት ሰዎች ብትጠይቅ የተሻለ ነው” በማለት ዜናውን ይፋ ላደረገው የጀርመን ድምጽ ሬዲዮ ተናግረዋል።lencho and melesየሚመለከታቸውን አካላት ለማግኘትና በሪፖርቱ ለማካተት እንዳልተቻለ ከሪፖርቱ ለመረዳት ተችሏል። አብዛኛው የኦነግ ደጋፊዎች የነበሩ በድርጅቱ የትግል ጉዞና ውጤታማ አለመሆን መማረራቸውን የተለያዩ ድረገጾች በስፋት ይዘግቡ ነበር።
ለአቶ መለስ ቅርብ እንደነበሩ የሚነገርላቸው አቶ ሌንጮ “አገር ቤት ገብተው ይሳካላቸው ይሆን?” የሚለውን ለመናገር “ህገ መንግሥቱንና ህገ መንግሥታዊ ስርዓቱን ተቀብዬ በሰላማዊ መንገድ ለመታገል ተስማምቼና ወድጄ ወደ አገር ቤት ለመግባት ችያለሁ” በማለት ኢቲቪ ዜናውን ይፋ ሲያደርገውና “ያሳዘነውን መንግስትና ህዝብ ይቅርታ እንጠይቃለን” ሲሉ ከተደመጠ በኋላ እንጂ ከወዲሁ አስተያየት መስጠት እንደሚቸግራቸው አስተያየት እንዲሰጡ የጠየቅናቸው ተናግረዋል። “ውሳኔውን ተፈጥሯዊ ጫና” ነው ያሉም አሉ።

Wednesday, 15 January 2014

ይህን አንብባችሁ ዝም አትበሉ ይህን መልዕክት ለሌላው በማስተላለፍ ተባበሩ:: !

ይህን አንብባችሁ ዝም አትበሉ ይህን መልዕክት ለሌላው በማስተላለፍ ተባበሩ !
3ኛ ወንጀል ችሎት በእኔ ላይ ፍርድ ሲሰጥ የተሰማኝን ሃዘንና ባዶነት የትኛውም ኢትዮጵያዊ ድጋሚ እንዲሰማው አልሻም ::በፈጣሪ እርዳታ ከእድሜም ልክ በላይ ምት ቢፈርዱብኝም ለምቀበል ተዘጋጅቼ ነበር :: ይሁንና ይኼን ያህል የሚያስፈርድ ወንጅል ቀርቶ አንድ ምሽት ወህኒ የሚያሳድር ወንጀል ባለመስራቴ ህሊናዬ ፍፁም እረፍት ይስማዋል ::እንዲህ አይነት ” የፍትህ ስርዓት ” ያለባት ሃገር ልጅ መሆኔ ግን የሃፍረት ማቅ አከናንቦኛል:: ዳኞቹ አሳዘኑኝም ፤ አሳፈርኝም::
ያም ሆነ ይህ እኔና እኔን መሰል ስዎች ያልሆነውን ሆናችሁ ተብለን የምንገፍው የመከራ ህይወት በኢትዮጵያችን የነፃነት ቀን እንዲጠባ የሚረዳ ክሆነ ፤ የሚከፈለው መስዋዕትነት ቢያንስ እንጂ ፈጽሞ አይበዛም:: በትውልድና በታሪክ ፊት ለከበረ ነፃነት ሲባል ዋጋ መክፈል ተመርቆ መፈጠር እንጂ ከቶም አለመታደል አይሆንም:: የልጆቻችንና የሚስቶቻችንም ስብራት ሁላችንም የምንኮራባት ሀገር ስትኖረን ያን ግዜ ይጠግን ይሆናል ::
ዛሬ ግን በዚች ሀገር የፍትህ ስርዓት አለን ብለን መናገር ፈጽሞ የማንችልበት ደረጃ ላይ እንገኛለን :: እንደዚህ ዘመን ፍትህ መሬት ላይ ተጥሎ የተዘበተበት ዘመን ይኖር ይሆን ? ፍርድ ቤቶቻችን የፍትህ መባ የሚፈታባቸው ምኩራቦች እስኪሆኑ ድረስ አበክረን ልንታገል ይገባል:: ይኽንን የነፃነት ብርሃን የሚናፍቅ ህዝብ በልበ ሙሉነትም የሚታገል ትውልድ የነፃነቱ ባለቤት ይሆናል:: ለመታግል ገዠዎችን መፍራት አያስፈልግም:: በተላይ ወጣቱ ለነገዋ ሀገሩ ዛሬ በእውነትና በልበ ሙሉነት ይቁምላት :: የኢትዮጵያን ህዝብ ሉዓላዊነት ለማረጋገጥ ከልብ የማይሰራ የኢህአዴግ አመራር ከፕለቲካ ሜዳው በአስቸኳይ ሊወጣ ይገባዋል፤ በተቃዋሚ ጎራውም ይኽን መሰል አስተሳሰብ ያለው ወገን ካለ መንገዱን ይልቀቅ:: ከዚህ በላይ ኢ-ፍትሐዊነትንና ኢ-ሰብአዊነትን በኢትዮጵያ ህዝብ ላይ እያሰፈኑ ሊቀጥሉ አይችሉም፤ ለፍትህ ለወንድማማችነትና ለነፃነት መንገዱን መልቀቅ አለባቸው:: በእኔ እይታ ሁሉንም የድርድር በሮች ዘግቶ የምላችሁን ብቻ ተቀበሉ ለሚል ጠቅላይ አገዛዝ መታዘዝ በሽታው እንዲብስበት ማድረግ ብቻ ነው :: ዘላቂ መፍትሄው ደግሞ በየግዜው የሚከፈለውን ዋጋ እየከፈሉ ከእውነትና ነፃነት ጋር መቆም ብቻ ነው::
በቃልቲ እስር ቤት የሚገኘው አቶ አንዱዓለም አራጌ ዋለ ” ያልተሄደበት መንገድ ” መጽሐፍ የተወሰደ
Image

Tuesday, 14 January 2014

28 Ethiopian political and civic organizations sent a protest letter to the UN

The Ethiopian Borders Affairs Committee sent a letter to the United Nations Secretary-General, H.E. Mr. Ban ki-Moon exposing the TPLF/EPRDF secret border deal with the Sudan and rejecting any attempt that violates upon the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Ethiopia. The protest letter has been endorsed by 28 Ethiopian political and civic organizations according to The Ethiopian Borders Affairs Committee.
Ethiopian Border Affairs Committee
P. O. Box 9536 Columbus, Ohio 43209 USA
E-mail: ethiopianborders@gmail.com
H.E Mr. Ban Ki-Moon
United Nations Secretary General
1st Avenue, 46th Street
New York, NY 10017
January 10, 2014
Your Excellency:
We, the undersigned representatives of various Ethiopian political parties, civic organizations and professional associations, have the honor to bring to your attention our strong protest against the secret border deal that the dictatorial governments of Ethiopia and the Sudan have recently been hatching.
The respective territorial limits of both countries were defined by the Anglo-Ethiopian Treaty of 1902 at the turn of the last century when Great Britain was the colonial power administering the Sudan.  As is customary in international practice in delimiting national boundaries, the treaty provided for the setting up of a Joint Boundary Commission to be appointed by both sides to carry out the actual demarcation of the boundary on the ground. Upon completion of the demarcation process both parties were required to notify their citizens of the boundary as demarcated.
Despite the clear mandate of these undertakings, however, the treaty has remained a dead letter for over a century and, as a consequence, the boundary between the two countries has never been demarcated by a joint commission. Instead, contrary to both the spirit and letter of the provisions of the treaty, Great Britain appointed its own officer, Major Charles W. Gwynn, to unilaterally and arbitrarily demarcate the boundary without the knowledge and the participation of Ethiopian boundary commissioners. In the event, the demarcation line which resulted from this high-handed exercise greatly favored the Sudan while causing Ethiopia to suffer a corresponding amount of territorial loss.
Notwithstanding the fact that the demarcation of the boundary by one of the Contracting Parties cannot legally bind the other, nevertheless Sudan has over the years importuned successive Ethiopian administrations to accept the validity of the unilateral demarcation undertaken by the British.  The consistent and unequivocal response of these administrations, however, has been to reject the validity of Sudan’s claims, calling instead for a negotiated settlement of the boundary on the basis of the original treaty with the full knowledge, participation and consent of peoples likely to be affected by the demarcation line.
As Your Excellency well knows, the international political system grants a considerable degree of importance to rights in respect of territory. The function of a boundary between states is the attribution of territory and, thus, the extent of a state’s territorial sovereignty. When the extent and limits of a state’s territorial sovereignty are determined solely and arbitrarily by one state to the detriment of the other, however, the boundary so determined becomes an enduring source of friction and tension between the adjoining states. It is precisely to avoid such a result that international law attributes to an international boundary a compelling degree of continuity and finality. Nevertheless, this venerable principle will be respected and observed in practice only if the given boundary was established in accordance with law. More importantly, a boundary regime can be regarded as final only where either of the states can clearly establish its legal credentials.  In the case of the Ethio-Sudan boundary, this means that the treaty regime set up by the parties – and no other arrangement- was meant to govern the boundary and title to territory.
According to media reports originating in the Sudan, however, under the just-concluded secret deal between the President of the Sudan and the Prime Minister of Ethiopia, huge swathes of our ancestral lands will be ceded to the Sudan.  These reports have been received with utter shock, resentment and anger by Ethiopians at home and abroad.  Neither the current generation of Ethiopians nor those of future generations will allow the deal to stand for it constitutes a serious violation of the treaty regime set up at the turn of the century and holds for naught the sacrifices of past generations of Ethiopians to preserve the territorial integrity of their country.  We wish to add that thousands of our people will be forced to lose their homes, farms and investments if the border deal is implemented without their participation and consent.
We are not unmindful that members of the United Nations and their sitting governments like those of the Sudan and Ethiopia are clothed with a certain degree of legitimacy in the eyes of international law and politics, even as such legitimacy deprives ordinary citizens adversely affected by the decisions of those who rule them legal standing and recourse in such matters. And yet the actions of these officials who purport to speak in their behalf are bereft of any legitimacy in the eyes of the very populace whose interests they claim to represent. This is particularly true when it concerns highly sensitive and emotionally charged questions of territorial sovereignty.  As such, the border deal of today hatched by unelected elites will be the ticking bomb of tomorrow.   Since it has neither support in law nor received the consent of the Ethiopian people, it will fester as a major source of friction and tension between the brotherly peoples of Ethiopia and the Sudan. Needless to add, the Horn of Africa region does not need an additional source of insecurity and instability beyond those that already plague the region. Accordingly, we wish to entreat Your Excellency to use your good offices to any extent appropriate and possible so as to forestall the dangerous situation the border deal is otherwise most likely to engender now or in the future if it goes into effect.
In any case, we would like to go on record as asserting our right to territorial sovereignty as defined by treaty – and not any other agreement that is reached behind the back of the Ethiopian people. We reserve the right to not honor any boundary that results from the agreement of an unelected government that is devoid of any support or legitimacy among its own people. In closing, we would like Your Excellency to know that the current extremely narrowly- based government of Ethiopia and the similarly discredited government of the Sudan are grasping at straws by using the border deal as a way of ensuring their political survival by a mutual exchange of promises foreswearing the use of their territories by organized movements seeking to overthrow their respective governments. This survival instinct underlies the parties’ desire to make a border deal and to keep it from public scrutiny without consideration of its impact on the people of Ethiopia.
Please accept the assurances of our highest consideration.
Sincerely,
  1. Ethiopian Border Affairs Committee (EBAC)
  2. Ethiopian People’s Congress for United Struggle (Shengo)
  3. Ethiopian People’s Revolutionary Party-Democratic (EPRP-D)
  4. Ethiopian Medhin Democratic Party (Medhin)
  5. All  Ethiopian Socialist Movement (ME’ISONE)
  6. Ethiopian People’s Patriotic Front (EPPF)
  7. Amara Democratic Movement Force (ADMF)
  8. Ethiopian Democratic Hibrehizb Unity Movement (EDHUM)
  9. Tatek Movement for Freedom, Democracy and Unity for Ethiopia
  10. Tigrean Alliance for National Democracy (TAND)
  11. Oromo Liberation Front (OLF)- led by General Kamal Galchuu
  12. Ethiopian National Transitional Council (ENTC)
  13. Moresh Wegenie Amara Organization (MWAO)
  14. The Legitimate Holy Synod of the Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo Church in Exile
  15. Gasha for Ethiopians
  16. Ethiopiawint: Council for the Defense of Citizens Right
  17. Beruh Ethiopia Democratic Movement
  18. Ethiopian Civic Consortium in UK
  19. Solidarity Committee for Ethiopian Political Prisoners – Canada (SOCEPP-Can)
  20. Ethiopian Civil Society Support Group in London, Ontario
  21. Anuak Justice Council
  22. Dallas Support Committee
  23. Solidarity Movement for a New Ethiopia (SMNE)
  24. Democracy For Ethiopia Forum in San Jose
  25. Ethio-Canada Democratic Forum in Ottawa
  26. Ethiopian Public Forum in Columbus, Ohio
  27. Mahdere Andinet Ethiopian Association
  28. Ethiopian Public Forum in Seattle, Washington
CC.
Embassy of the Republic of the Sudan
2210 Massachusetts Ave. NW
Washington, DC 20008
Dr. Nkosazana Dlamini Zuma
Chairperson of the African Union Commission
P. O. Box 3243
Roosvelt Street
(Old Airport Area)
W21K19
Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
Fax: 251-11-551-7844

አንዱዋለም ግንቦት ሰባት ከተባለ እኔም ግንቦት ሰባት ነኝ – ግርማ ካሳ

«በሕገ መንግስቱ የመደራጀት መብታቸው የተጠበቀላቸው ፓርቲዎችን አልከሰስንም።ፓርቲዎችን ግን ሽፋን አድርገዉ ስርዓቱን ወይንም ሕገ መንግስታዊ ስርዓቱን ለመናድ እንቀሳቀሳለን የሚሉ ኃይሎችን ግን ዛሬም ፣ ነገም ፣ ሕጉን የማስከበር ግዴታና ሃላፊነት ስላለብን ከመከሰስ አያመልጡም ማለት ነዉ።»
ኢቲቪ በቅርቡ በ«ሽብርተኝነት» ላይ፣ በቅርቡ ባቀረበዉ አሳዛኝ ዶኩሜንተሪ ላይ ፣ የፌደራል መንግስት አቃቤ ሕግ፣ አቶ ብርሃኑ ወንድማገኝ የተናገሩት ነበር።
እኝህ የሕግ ባለሞያ እየደጋገሙ ሕግን ስለማክበርና ስለ ሕገ መንግስቱ ነግረዉናል። ስለሕገ መንግስት ካነሳን አይቀር አንድ ነገር ጣል ላድርግ። የሕገ መንግስቱ አንቀጽ 29 ንኡስ አንቀጽ 4 «በመንግስት ገንዘብ የሚካሄድ ወይንም በመንግስት ቁጥጥር ሥር ያለ መገናኛ ብዙሃን የተለያዩ አስተያየቶችን ለማስተናገድ በሚያስችለው ሁኔታ እንዲመራ ይደረጋል» የሚል ድንጋጌ ያካትታል። ኢቲቪ በሕዝብ ገንዘብ የሚተዳደር እንደመሆኑ ይህ የሕገ መንግስት አንቀጽ ይመለከተዋል። ነገር ግን ኢቲቪ በቀጥታ፣ ሕግ መንግስቱን ሲንድ፣ ገለልተኛነት በጎደለው መልኩ የአንድ ድርጅትን የፖለቲክ ፕሮፖጋንዳ መጠቀሚያ ሲሆን ነው እያየን ያለነዉ። እነ አንዱዋለም አራጌ ላይ፣ ኢቲቪ የአንድ ወገንን አቋም የያዘ፣ የስም ማጥፋት ዘመቻ ሲያዥጎደጉድ፣ ቢያንስ ቢያንስ ጥቂት ሰኮንዶች፣ የአንዷለምን ጠበቃዎች፣ ወይንም ቤተሰብ፣ አሊያም የትግል አጋሮቹ የሆኑት የአንድነት አመራር አባላትን ለማነጋገር አልተሞከረም። እንግዲህ ከዚህ የምንረዳዉ፣ ሕግን በማክበር አኳያ፣ ሕወሃት/ኢሕአዴጎችና ኢቲቪ፣ አንድ ጣታቸዉን ወደሌሎች ሲጠቁሙ፣ አራቱ ጣቶቻቸው ወደ እነርሱ መዞራቸውን፣ ሕገ መንግስቱን እየጣሱ ያሉ እነርሱ መሆናቸውን ነዉ።
«አንዱዋለም አራጌን በተመለከተ፣ የግንቦት ሰባትን ተእልኮ ለማስፈጸም አገር ዉስጥ በሕቡእ (ስዉር) ይንቀሳቀሳል በሰላማዊ ትግል እንታገላለን የሚሉ የፓርቲዎችን ሽፋን አድርጎ ሲንቀሳቀስ የነበረ በመሆኑ በቂ ማስረጃ አቅርበናል» ሲሉ ነበር የፌደራል አቃቤ ሕጉ ለኢቲቪ አክለው የገለጹት። ምን አይነት መረጃ እንዳቀረቡ ግን አልነገሩንም። ለምን ቢባል ምንም ስለሌለ።
አንዱዋለም ያደርጋቸው የነበሩ እንቅስቃሴዎች በሙሉ ሲያደርግ የነበረው በግልጽና በገሃድ ነዉ። ለተለያዩ ፓልቶክ ክፍሎች፣ አገር ዉስጥና በዉጭ ለሚገኙ ሜዲያዎች በርካታ ቃለ መጠይቆችን ሰጥቷል። በአገር ቤት፣ በአንድነት ፓርቲ ዉስጥ ሆነ በተለያዩ ቦታዎች በተደረጉ ዉይይቶችና ስብሰባዎች ያቀረባቸው ንግግሮች በሙሉ የተደበቁ አይደሉም። ዉጭ ካሉ ኢትዮጵያዊያን ጋር (አንዱም እኔው ነበርኩ) ፣ ብዙ ጊዜ በስልክ ሃሳቦችን ተለዋዉጧል። በስልክ ያደረጋቸው ንግግሮችም፣ 24 ሰዓት የሰላማዊ ተቃዋሚ መሪዎችን ስልክ በሚጠልፈው ቴሌ ዘንድ የተሰሙ ናቸው። ቤቱና ቢሮዉ ከላይ እስከ ታች ተበርብረዉ ፣ የሚስጥራዊ የኮሚኒኬሽን መሳሪያዎች፣ ቦምቦች፣ ፈንጂዎች፣ ሚስጥራዊ ሰነዶች አልተገኙም። ኤሜሎቹ በሙሉ ተነበዋል። አንዱዋለምን ከግንቦት ሰባት ጋር የሚያገናኝ፣ በሕቡእ እንቅስቃሴ እያደረገ እንደሆነ የሚያመለክት አንዳች መረጃ አቃቤ ሕግ አላቀረበም። መረጃዎች ቢኖሩ ኖሮ፣ «እንኳን ዘንቦብሽ ድሮም ጤዛ ነሽ» እንደተባለ፣ ዜጎችን በማዋረድና በማሳነስ የሚታወቀዉ ኢቲቪ፣ ይሄን ጊዜ በስፋት ያወራልን ነበር።
ኢቲቪ ግን አንዱዋለምን ለመክሰስ ያቀረበው፣ አንድ የአንድነት አባል የነበሩ፣ ተስፋሁን አናጋዉ የተባሉ ሰው የተናገሩትን ነዉ። አንዱዋለም ከታሰረ በኋላ አቃቤ ሕጎች መረጃ ማቅረብ ባለመቻላቸው፣ የዉሸት መረጃዎች ማሰባሰቡ የግድ ሆነባቸው። የታሰሩ ሌሎች የአንድነት አባላትን ማግባባት ጀመሩ። «በአንዱዋለም ላይ እኛ ተናገሩ የምንላችሁን ከተናጋራችሁ እንፈታቹሃለን» ብለው እጆቻቸዉን ጠመዘዙ። ብዙዎች በአንዱዋለም ላይ የዉሸት መረጃ ማቅረቡ ሕሊናቸውን ስለከበደው ፍቃደኛ አልሆኑም። ነገር ግን እንደ ተስፋሁን አናጋው፣ የሚባሉ ደካማ ሰዎች ተገኙና የዉሸት ምስክርነት ቀረበ። እንግዲህ በአገዛዙ ካድሬዎች ተቀናብረው ከቀረቡ የዉሽት ምስክርነቶች ዉጭ፣ ቅንጣት የምታክል፣ አንዱዋለምን ሽብርተኛ ወይንም ከግንቦት ስባት ጋር የሚሰራ መሆኑን የሚያሳይ መረጃ አልቀረበም።
«ግንቦት ሰባት ፣ ግንቦት ሰባት ……» እንባላለን። ከጅምሩ በግንቦት ሰባት ላይ ጠንካራ ተቃዉሞ ያለኝ ሰው ነኝ። የግንቦት ሰባት ፖለቲካ አይመቸኝም፣ ለአገርም ይጠቅማል ብዬ አላስብም። ግንቦት ሰባቶች ከያዙት የተሳሳተ መንገድ እንዲመለሱ፣ በሻእቢያ ድጋፍ ሳይሆን፣ በሕዝብ ጉልበት በመተማመን ወደ ሰላሙ መንገድ እንዲመጡ መክሪያለሁ። በተለያዩ ጊዜያት ለአንባቢያን ያቀረብኳቸውን ጽሆፍችን መመልከት ይቻላል።
ከቅንጅት ጊዜ ጀምሮ በአገር ዉስጥ በሰላም ለዉጥ ለማምጣት የሚሰሩ ድርጅቶችን ደግፊያለሁ። በተለይም የአንድነት ፓርቲ በጣም የሚመቸኝ ፓርቲ እንደመሆኑ፣ አንዱዋለም አራጌን ጨምሮ፣ ከፓርቲዉ አመራር አባላት ጋር ሃሳብ የተለዋወጥኩባቸው በርካታ ጊዜያት ነበሩ። አንዱዋለም አራጌ፣ እግዚአብሄርን የሚፈራ፣ የልጆች አባት፣ የሰላማዊ ትግል አርበኛ ነዉ። አንዱዋለም ስለ ትጥቅ ትግል ያለዉን አመለካከት አውቃለሁ። በየትኛዉም መድረክና ፍርድ ቤት፣ መጽህፍ ቅዱስ ላይ እጄን ጭኜ የምመሰክረዉ ነዉ። አንዱዋለም አራጌ የግንቦት ስባት አባል ወይንም ሽብርተኛ ነው የሚለውን፣ በምን መስፈርትና መልኩ ልቀበለው አልችልም። በርግጥ አንዱዋለም የግንቦት ሰባት አባል ከተባለ፣ እኔም የግንቦት ሰባት አባል ነኝ እንደ ማለት ነዉ።
በጣም ያሳዝናል። እንደ አንዱዋለም አራጌ አይነት አገር ወዳድ ዜጎች፣ አገራቸዉን በመዉደዳቸው፣ የሕዝብ መብት ይከበር በማለታቸው፣ «ሽብርተኞች» በሚል አሳዛኝ ክስ ሲታሰሩ ማየት፣ አገራችን ኢትዮጵያ ዜጎች ቀና ብለው የሚራመዱባት ሳይሆን ፣ አሳፋሪ ድራማ የሚካሄድባት፣ ሕግ መቀለጃ የሆነባት አገር መሆኗ፣ በርግጥ ልብን የሚያደማ ነው።
እንግዲህ፣ ሁሌ እንደማደርገዉ፣ ጥሪ ለኢሕአዴጎች አስተላልፋለሁ። ኢሕአዴግ ዉስጥ፣ ለአገርና ለሕዝብ የሚያስቡ ካሉ፣ በድርጅታቸው ዉስጥ እየተደረገ ያለውን አፈናና ግፍ በቃ የማለት አቅምና ጉልበት ሊኖራቸው ይገባል ባይ ነኝ። ድርጅታቸው ዉስጥ ያሉ ጥቂቶች ድርጅታቸውን ይዘው ገደል እንዲወስዱ ሊፈቀድላቸው አይገባም። እነ አንዱዋለምን በማሰር ኢሕአዴግ ምንም የሚጠቀመው ነገር የለም። እነ አንዱዋለምን በዉሸት ክስ ከሶ፣ በቴለቭዥኝ ደግሞ ስማቸውን ማጉደፍ፣ ነዉር ነዉ። ኢሕአዴግ የበለጠ እንዲጠላ የሚያደርግ ነዉ። የአረና ትግራይ አመራር አባል አብርሃ ደስታ አንዴ ሲጽፍ፣ የሕወሃት እምብርት በነበረችው የትግራይ ክልል፣ አንዱዋለም አራጌ በጣም ተወዳጅ ፖለቲከኛ እንደሆነ ገልጾ ነበር። አንዱዋለም አራጌ፣ በክልሎች ሁሉ ሕዝብ የሚያውቀዉ ጀግና መሪ ነዉ። በርሱ ላይ እየተደረገ ያለው ዘመቻ፣ የበለጠ አንዱዋለምን ከፍ የሚያደርግ፣ ኢሕአዴግን ደግሞ የሚያሳንስ ነዉ። አንዱዋለምን እና ሌሎች የሕሊና እስረኞች፣ አለመፍታት በቀጥታ ከሕዝቡ ጋር እንደመላተም ነው። አይጠቅምም። ጉዳት አለው።
ለኢሕአዴጎች ጥሪ ባቀርብም፣ የነአንዱዋለም ጉዳይ፣ የኢሕአዴጎች ጉዳይ ብቻ ግን አደለም። ኢሕአዴጎች ወደ ሕሊናቸው ተመልሰው መልካም ነገር ያደርጉ ዘንድ እነርሱን ማነጋገርና ለማሳመን መሞከር፣ ማበረታታት ተገቢ ነዉ የሚል እምነት ቢኖረኝም፣ ሁሉንም ነገር ከነርሱ ጠብቆ ቁጭ ማለቱ ግን፣ እጅግ በጣም ትልቅ ስህተት ነው። እነርሱ ቢሰሙ መልካም ነዉ፤ ካልሆነ ግን እያንዳንዳችን መብታችንን የማስከበር ሃላፊነት ያለብን ይመስለኛል። ዛሬ እነ አንዱዋለም ናቸው። ነገ እያንዳንዳችን ቤት ይንኳኳል ። ዛሬ ሊመቸን ይችላል። ነገር ግን ለሕይወታችን ምንም ዋስትና አይኖረንም። አንድ የመንግስት ባለስልጣን ፊታችንን አይቶ ከጠላን፣ በቀላሉ ወደ ወህኒ ሊወረወረን የሚችልበት ሁኔታ እንዳለ ማወቅ አለብን። አለን የምንለውን ቢዝነስ አንዱ ከፈለገዉ፣ «ያለ የሌለዉን እያመጡ፣ ይሄን ያህል ግብር ክፈል» ተብለን ከጨዋታ ዉጭ በቀላሉ ልንሆን የምንችልበት አገር ነዉ ያለችን። አቤት የምንልበት የሕግ ስርዓት የለም። አብዛኞቹ ዳኞች በመመሪያ የሚፈርዱ ካድሬዎች ናቸው። በመሆኑም፣ ኢትዮጵያ፣ ሕግ የበላይ የሆነባት፣ ለሁሉ ዜጎቸ እኩል የሆነች፣ ኢትዮጵያዊያን ሳይፈሩና ሳይሸማቀቁ ሃሳባቸውን በነጻነት መግለጽ የሚችሉባት፣ መቀባባል፣ ይቅርታ፣ ፍቅር፣ ሰላም ፣ ፍትህና ወንድማማችነት የሰፈነባት፣ የበለጸገች አገር እንድትሆን፣ እያንዳንዳችን የድርሻችንን መወጣት አለብን። ዳር ሆኖ ተቀመጦ ማውራት ይብቃ። ሌሎች ለምን እንዲህ አላደረጉም ብሎ መክሰስ ይብቃ። ሌሎች ሞተው በነርሱ አስክሬን ላይ ተረማመደን ለመሻሻል መሞከር ይብቃ። አገራችን የእስክንደር፣ ወይንም የአንዱዋለም፣ ወይንም የበቀለ ገርባ፣ ወይንም የርዮት አለሙ ብቻ ሳትሆን የሁላችንም ናት፣ ሁላችንም ተስፋ ሳንቆርጥ፣ ሌሎች ነጻ እንዲያወጡን ሳንጠብቅ፣ የድርሻችንን እንወጣ።

Demonizing Ethiopian History

demonization and vilification campaign against Atse Menelik II


Atse Menelik II
The regime in power in Ethiopia today is orchestrating a full-court press demonization and vilification campaign against Atse Menelik II, the Nineteenth Century Ethiopian emperor whose centennial is being celebrated this year (Ethiopian calendar). The campaign is conducted largely through regime lackey-proxies, stooges and puppets. Through its minions, the regime has used the most loathsome words, inflammatory rhetoric and repugnant imagery to describe Menelik’s alleged brutality in his quest for territorial conquest. The regime’s servile drones have been all over social media parroting historical lies, distortions, fabrications, disinformation and falsehoods. The agitators have tried to whip up a propaganda frenzy in an attempt to caricature, demean and demonize the great Ethiopian leader. One hundred years after his death, they have tried to resurrect him as the devil incarnate. Barely two years after Meles Zenawi’s death they want to resurrect him as the savior of Ethiopia.
One need not be surprised by the volume or vehemence of the propaganda attack on Atse Menelik or the regime’s methodical and organized campaign to incite hatred and ill-will by trotting out Menelik’s Ghost. The fact of the matter is that the real issue is not about the demonization (making a devil) of Menelik but about the canonization (making a saint) of the regime’s late capo di tutti capi (boss of all bosses) Meles Zenawi.
Demons Demonizing Atse Menelik II
The vehement demonization propaganda campaign being waged against Atse Menelik II is a futile attempt to re-write, miswrite, overwrite and un-write Ethiopian history with the hagiography (tale of sainthood) of Meles Zenawi. They want to unwrite Menelik’s history and write up Meles’ history as the greatest African leader of modern times. They want to mythologize Meles, the “new breed of African leader”; Meles the bringer of developmental state democracy; Meles, the African leader on Global Warming and Climate change; Meles, the African leader who rubs elbows with leaders of the G-8 and the G-20; Meles, the chairperson of the Beijing Summit of the Forum on China-Africa Cooperation; Meles, the destroyer of Somali jihadists and terrorists… By demonizing Menelik, they want to canonize (make a saint) Meles. Why demonize Menelik? Because he created a modern African nation from petty feuding fiefdoms, kingdoms, princedoms and chiefdoms. He is demonized because he stood up and whipped on the battlefield one of the great European imperialist powers and permanently secured Ethiopian independence and sovereignty. He is demonized because he was a true African leader. By defaming Menelik and degrading his legacy, they seek to give fame to Meles and sanctify his legacy.
The regime wants to completely overwrite the history of Atse Menelik. Menelik was the first African leader to build a railroad. They want to overwrite that history by claiming Meles was the first to bring a  magnificent long distance and light rail system to Ethiopia. Menelik was the first African leader to introduce the telephone and telegraph on the continent. When the first telephone was installed in Menelik’s palace in 1889 thirteen years after Alexander Graham Bell patented his “apparatus for vocal sounds”, anxious clergymen asked him to remove it as the work of Satan, which he declined. Within a decade, Menelik had inaugurated a telephone line connecting the capital with the eastern city of Harar. They want overwrite that history by claiming that Meles brought the most modern communication system to Ethiopia. The truth of the matter is that the first African country to have telephone and telegraph service today has the worst mobile telephone and internet service in Africa. Last week, The Wall Street Journal reported that while farmers in Ethiopia have cell (mobile) phones, “The trouble is, they have to walk several miles to get a good signal.” Ethiopia has the second worst internet service in Africa.
They want to miswrite history by depicting Menelik as brutal king who lopped off women’s breasts. When it comes to brutality, is there anyone more brutal and cold-blooded than Meles Zenawi? Meles personally ordered the massacre of hundreds of unarmed protesters in 2005. Meles’s own hand-picked and appointed Inquiry Commission reported that police and security officials under Meles’ direct personal command and control intentionally and deliberately massacred 193 unarmed protesters and severely wounded 763 others. Meles personally ordered the massacre of over 400 hundred civilians in Gambella, in western Ethiopia in 2004.  Meles personally authorized the bombing and strafing of villages in the Ogaden. Under Meles’ personal command, his troops in the Ogaden committed gang rapes, burned villages, conducted “demonstration killings” including public hangings and beheadings intended to terrorize the population.  Steve Crawshaw, the United Nations advocacy director for Human Rights Watch described the crimes against humanity committed in the Ogaden as “a mini-Darfur.”
They want to rewrite history by depicting Menelik as an enemy of the Oromo people. There is more than sufficient evidence to prosecute Meles, if he were alive, and members of his gang for the untold and unspeakable crimes against humanity they committed against the Oromo people. The international human rights organization Freedom House in 2012 reported that Meles and his regime engaged in widespread discrimination and repression against Oromo people.  Meles has banned the Oromo Liberation Front and jailed untold numbers of suspected members and leaders without due process of law.  According to former Ethiopian President Negasso Gidada, when he left office in 2001 “roughly 25,000 people were in prison on OLF-related charges throughout Oromia and in Addis Ababa.” Meles’ former comrade and defense minister Seeye Abraha ironically observed: “Kaliti Prison speaks Oromiffa, and 99% of one of the camps housing hundreds of inmates at Kality Prison are Oromo. Many of the detainees don’t know their charges but have counted years as OLF suspects.”
Meles invaded Somalia in 2006 on the bogus pretext that jihadist were taking over that country and that he had been “invited” by the Somalis to intervene.  In a televised address Meles said, “Ethiopian defense forces were forced to enter into war to protect the sovereignty of the nation and to blunt repeated attacks by Islamic courts terrorists and anti-Ethiopian elements they are supporting.” On December 27, 2006, Meles’ troops and tanks stormed into Mogadishu. By August 2007, Meles’ troops were bogged down in Somalia and the human cost was proving to be horrendous: Tens of thousands of Somali civilians had died and over 870,000 were forced to flee their homes in Mogadishu, a bustling city of 1.2 million people in 2006. After Meles’ invasion, international human rights organizations described Somalia “as one of the worst humanitarian situations in Africa.”
Menelik fought defensive wars against Europe’s imperialist aggressors and won. It is undeniable that Menelik was the first African leader in history to decisively defeat a mighty European power in battle and send them packing back to Europe with their tails between their legs. Menelik whipped the Italians at Amba Alagi and Mekele and delivered the final blow at the Battle of Adwa in 1896. No European could have imagined that an army of “black African savages” could defeat a mighty European imperial power. Menelik was a brilliant military tactician and despite his extreme disadvantages in modern weaponry, tactics and resources, he prevailed triumphantly crushing once and for all the ideology of white superiority and supremacy. Through trickery and deception, various European imperial powers sought to carve out pieces of Ethiopia as colonial territories. In 1889, Menelik concluded the Treaty of Uccialli with Italy with respect to certain territories in the north of the country.  When he found out that the Italian language version of the treaty, in stark contrast to the Amharic version, had rendered Ethiopia an Italian protectorate, he denounced the agreement.
They want to rewrite this history by showcasing Meles as the regional and international leader who made Ethiopia a regional power. They want to portray him as the man who defended Ethiopian territorial integrity and sovereignty. The facts show otherwise. Meles fought the Eritreans in 1998-99 over a border dispute in Badme, secured a military victory at the cost of 80,000 Ethiopian lives and promptly agreed to turn over Badme to the Eritreans in international arbitration. Never in the history of warfare has a victorious army turned over its victory to the vanquished so willingly. After defeating the socialist military junta in 1991, during transitional negotiations moderated by the U.S., Meles refused to accept the port of Assab on the Eritrean coast as Ethiopia’s outlet to the sea. Meles is singularly responsible for making Ethiopia a landlocked country. Through secret treaties Meles has given away Ethiopian territory to the Sudanese without so much as perfunctorily consulting his rubber stamp parliament. Meles has pawned off millions of hectares of the most fertile land in the country to underhanded fly-by-night operators.
Menelik united Ethiopia and inaugurated the modern Ethiopian state.  Meles brought the illusion of modernization. He built hospitals without doctors or medicine. He once said we don’t need doctors. He built universities without competent professors, books, libraries or modern technology. He built buildings without sewers. Menelik opened Ethiopia to Western civilization. Meles took Ethiopia back to Oriental despotism with his ludicrous theory of the “developmental state”. After taking power in 1991, Meles fragmented the modern Ethiopian state and promptly proceeded to balkanize the country into so-called kilils, or apartheid-style bantustans or kililistans. Despite Meles’ completely bogus claims of double-digit economic growth and exhortations of of Ethiopia as the “fastest for a non-oil exporting country in Sub-Saharan Africa”, Ethiopia atually became the second poorest country in the world as I documented in my commentary, “Why is Ethiopia Poor?
Menelik was a “renaissance” Ethiopian leader.  He took important steps to strengthen and modernize his country. He eagerly embraced modern technology and brought new communication systems to the country. Menelik introduced the telephone and telegraph and a modern postal system. He introduced electricity to Addis Ababa. He imported the first motor car and even tried to introduce a modern Ethiopian currency replacing the Maria Theresa thaler, the silver bullion coin that had been used in world trade at the time. Menelik always placed Ethiopian sovereignty above all else. In 1894, Menelik gave the French a concession to lay rail lines from Djibouti to Addis Ababa. The same year, the European imperial powers held the Berlin Conference and carved up Africa for European colonialism. When the French tried to pull a fast one to divest Ethiopian sovereignty over the rail line, Menelik shut them down cold and relented only after reasserting Ethiopian sovereignty in 1906. They want to rewrite that history by writing a bogus narrative of Meles, the Renaissance Leader, the Builder of Hydroelectric Dams Unseen in African History, the Builder of Bridges, Roads and Railroads…   
Menelik may have presided over a feudal kingdom. He is an African leader who did what he could under extreme domestic and international conditions. He left a legacy of an Ethiopia, one nation under God, under Allah. Meles’ enduring legacy is that he created the first true thugtatorship in Africa. As I explained in my Huffington Post commentary, “If democracy is government of the people, by the people and for the people, a thugocracy is a government of thieves, for thieves, by thieves. Simply stated, a thugtatorship is rule by a gang of thieves and robbers (thugs) in designer suits. In a thugtatorship, the purpose of seizing and clinging to political power is solely to accumulate personal wealth for the ruling class by stealing public funds and depriving the broader population scarce resources necessary for basic survival.”
The fact of Meles’ thugtatorship is amply documented not only in the records but also in the eyewitness  testimony of his former comrades-in-arms. From the inception in the bush, Meles and his comrades set up a kleptocratic system of administration. They diverted tens of millions of dollars earmarked for famine relief in Tigrai region in the early 1980s to buy weapons and enrich themselves. Recent reports have shown that over one-half of the Ethiopian economy is controlled by Meles’ officials, supporters, cronies, friends, comrades and others. Corruption and theft of state resources is so endemic in Ethiopia that the World Bank singled out Ethiopia as a case study of corruption in its nearly 500-page report entitled, “Diagnosing Corruption in Ethiopia”. Thugtatorship shall be the lasting legacy of Meles. 
They just love to hate Menelik
Hate is a symptom of a terminal sickness of the soul. Hate is irrational. The scientific literature on hate shows that haters hate because they are afraid, insecure, jealous; or because they hate themselves; or because they  want to become the very object of their hate. Above all, haters hate themselves because they feel inadequate, powerless, hopeless and helpless. 
Mandela said, “No one is born hating another person because of the color of his skin, or his background, or his religion. People must learn to hate.” When I think of those in power in Ethiopia today, I wonder and ponder if Mandela is right in his philosophical assessment. He added, “If they can learn to hate, they can be taught to love, for love comes more naturally to the human heart than its opposite.” I really want to believe that Mandela’s principle would apply to those in power despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary.
As a matter of principle and practice, we must strive to live by Gandhi’s rule: “Hate the sin and not the sinner.” When we hate the haters, we become their mirror images. We are who we hate. If we hate Meles or his gang as a human beings, we become them. If we must hate, it must be their acts and not them as human beings.
Hate is a powerful force. The hate spread by the Nazis destroyed entire nations. Hate in Rwanda destroyed the lives of millions of Rwandans. In Darfur, hate destroyed the lives of millions of Sudanese. Thousands continue to die in Nigeria and the Central African Republic because of religious hatred today. We must never, never give into hate.
I believe there are two types of people in the world. There are those who follow the golden rule “love thy neighbor as thyself.” There are others who live by what I call the “copper rule”, “hate thy neighbor as thyself.” Haters think they can overcome their own helplessness, insecurity, guilt and inability to change their circumstances by hating. They hope to raise their feelings of inferiority and low self-worth by hating others. Those who hate Menelik do not really hate Menelik; they hate themselves and wish they could be Menelik and whatever he symbolizes.
I pity those in power in Ethiopia today. I really do. I feel sorry for them. They think they can sanctify their late leader and their two-decade history by demonizing great Ethiopian leaders and tearing down Ethiopian history. They think by tearing down Menelik and Haile Selassie they can build up Meles. They think that by removing Menelik’s statutes from public places and plastering cheap posters of Meles at every street corner they can elevate Meles to the status of a deity. Meles fought tooth and nail to make sure H.I.M. Haile Selassie’s statute would not sit next to Nkrumah’s on the grounds of the African Union in Ethiopia. Yet Nkruma himself said there would have been no Organization of African Unity but for the relentless efforts of H.I.M. Haile Selassie. 
Despite prolonged reflection on the nature of the hate practiced by those in power in Ethiopia today, I find no rational explanation. Most people fear and are apprehensive of the future because it is unknown and unpredictable. I cannot fathom people who fear the past, the distant past, the Nineteenth Century Ethiopia. In my professional experience, I have learned that the only people who fear and dread the past are criminals fearful that the crimes they have committed in the past will eventually catch up with them. I have also come to the conclusion that those in power hate to cover up and conceal their abuses and misuses of power and use hate to divide and rule. They use hate to create fear and loathing among Ethiopians of different ethnic groups so that they will not be the object of scrutiny and accountability. Hate mongering is used to distract people from their economic problems.
Love thy hater as thyself
The golden rule says, “love thy neighbor as thy self.” I say, “love thy hater as thyself.” It is better to love than to hate. Hate is like a boomerang. It goes out and comes around to the hater. To paraphrase Mandela, hate is a poison of the soul. When haters hate, they are drinking poison and expecting those they hate to die. There is also a strange dialectics to hate that those in power should heed. Hate often transforms the hated into an object of love and admiration. Those in power in Ethiopia today should learn from the experiences of their apartheid soul mates in the old South Africa. The apartheid masters sought to diminish Mandela’s humanity, leadership and reputation for decades. They put out all sorts of propaganda about him as a terrorist and communist and never released a single photo of him during his years of captivity. However, the law of unintended consequences prevailed. As time passed and the anti-apartheid movement grew, Mandela’s invisibility only added to his mythic status and helped transform him into an international icon. The lesson is that the more they try to demonize Menelik and Haile Selassie, the more Menelik and Haile Selassie will be popular in the imagination of the younger generation. The more the older generation will reassess its views about these leaders as they become the objects of unending and relentless campaigns of vilification.
We must go beyond hate to love. Dr. Martin Luther King and Mandela have taught us about the unconquerable power of love (agape) of humanity and community; the power of healing a society afflicted by the cancer of racial, ethnic and religious hate. Mandela had every reason to hate and exact revenge. For 27 years Mandela’s name was Prisoner no. 46664.  When he emerged from the prison gates that February morning in 1990, he beamed with that million dollar smile of his. He did not have a single hateful thing to say about the masters of apartheid who jailed him for 27 years and separated him from his family. He taught us a great lesson: “As I walked out the door toward the gate that would lead to my freedom, I knew if I didn’t leave my bitterness and hatred behind, I’d still be in prison.” Mandela was never a prisoner of hate. The prison was apartheid hate itself and the inmates were the wardens and masters of apartheid. Mandela left prison to liberate the real inmates of apartheid chained behind their walls of hate, fear and revenge. 
If those in power in Ethiopia today continue with their hate, they will find themselves in much the same situation as those who were in power in apartheid South Africa. The “free” whites during apartheid stayed up all night thinking about what the black Africans they had repressed for so long could do to them when inevitable majority rule comes. The hatred they had for black Africans not only denied them sleepless nights but also destroyed their heart, minds and souls, their humanity. They became zombies; the walking dead unable to enjoy the comforts of their wealth; their exclusive neighborhoods became virtual prisons gated and surrounded by electric fencing and prison-style razor wires. They live in virtual armed camps.
There is a better way. Rather than responding with more hateful vitriol, we should be more determined to find out the truth. We should bring out the truth about Atse Menelik II, Atse Haile Selassie, Colonel/President Mengistu Hailemariam and Prime Minster Meles Zenawi. Let us learn from their mistakes not to hate them but to make sure we the living do not repeat their mistkes. Let us learn from their errors not to engage in recrimination but to find ways of reconciliation and to correct their mistakes. We should band together with Ethiopia’s young people to build the New Beloved Ethiopia where no man or woman has to identify him/herself by his/her ethnicity but his/her humanity, Africanity and Ethiopianity. Let us build a New Beloved Ethiopia where no man or woman feels so secure in his/her powers that s/he can order the massacre of unarmed citizens and innocent civilians and get away with it. We must work together to create a society that respects the dignity and rights of every individual regardless of his/her ethnicity, faith or language. That is how we must build a future, not by tearing down a past that has long faded into the fog of time.
Let us not get offended or angry by the rhetoric of hate. It serves no useful purpose. Let us expose the demonization campaign, debunk the myths, and defend against the demonization and molestation of Ethiopian history. Let’s us not throw ourselves in the mud and muck with the haters. We should never forget George Bernard Shaw’s admonition, “I learned long ago, never to wrestle with a pig. You get dirty, and besides, the pig likes it.” Exchanging hateful words with professional, and possibly born haters, haters is like wrestling with pigs in the mud.
Changing hate to love
Let the haters hate and lie. There is not much we can do about that. What is within our power is the ability to  change ourselves from hating to loving; we have the capacity to transform  negative energy into positive energy. We should change from hating to loving not because it is easy but because it is exceedingly difficult. Love, whether of self, others, community or nation requires a lot of work.
Let us learn from Gandhi and his way of Satyagraha or “truth force”.  Gandhi explained, “Truth (satya) implies love, and firmness (agraha) engenders and therefore serves as a synonym for force.” The aim is to convert the hater not to coerce him or her. In practical terms, the aim is to convince the hater that the hate in his/her heart, mind and soul will destroy him/her; that his/her only salvation is love of self, community and nation. Let us use Satyagraha to make lovers out of haters.
We should learn from Dr. King: “Darkness cannot drive out darkness: only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate: only love can do that.” He taught that “we must develop and maintain the capacity to forgive. He who is devoid of the power to forgive is devoid of the power to love. There is some good in the worst of us and some evil in the best of us. When we discover this, we are less prone to hate our enemies.” Forgiveness and reconciliation are the antidotes, the cure, for hate.
We should even learn from the greatest comic of modern times, Charlie Chaplin: “The hate of men will pass, and dictators die, and the power they took from the people will return to the people. And so long as men die, liberty will never perish.” Liberty will outlive all haters.  Let us close ranks regardless of ethnicity and reaffirm our basic humanity in our Ethiopianity and Africanity. Let’s leave no room for haters; we should crowd them out.
Message to those in power in Ethiopia today
My message to the hate mongers in power in Ethiopia is simple. The hate you propagate today will boomerang back to you. Today you smile and snicker at the statute dedicated to show Menelik as a breast lopping brute. Those who are told to hate Menelik today will be told to hate Meles tomorrow. The day is not long when your great visionary leader Meles will be commemorated in stone and marble as the Second Coming of Rodolfo Graziani in the Ogaden, Gambella, Addis Ababa and elsewhere. Those you hold as friends today will be your mortal enemies tomorrow. Those you demonize as your enemies today will be your friends tomorrow when the chips are down and you are on the receiving end. That is the dialectics of history.  Learn from history.  
Atse Menelik II was neither saint nor demon; he was neither divine nor a demigod. He was an African king  who tried to unite and modernize Ethiopia when the rest of Africa was on the chopping block of European imperialism being sliced, diced, spiced, spliced, priced and sacrificed. Let Menelik II be judged by only one measure: The Truth. Historians should tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth about Menelik. In his centenary commemoration, I submit the testimony of the Belgian explorer, Baron de Jarlsburg, given to the New York Times in 1909  as part, and only part, of the historical evidence to be used in pronouncing judgment on Atse Menelik II:
Menelik has since accession to the throne, twenty years ago, transformed Abyssinia from a semi-barbarous power to a State modeled on the lines of a European constitutional monarchy… The sovereign, who styles himself somewhat pompously, Conquering Lion of the Tribe of Juda, Elect of the Saviour, King of Kings of Ethiopia, shattered Italy’s colonial ambitions by his victories at Amba-Garima… When Menelik was crowned Emperor of Ethiopia on Nov. 4, 1889, after King Johanne’s death, he was far from being the accepted ruler of all the States which constitute the Abyssinian empire. It was only after much hard fighting that Menelik finally succeeded in subjugating those rebellious chieftains who did not recognize him… Since then, Menelik’s one aim has been to introduce European civilization into his country. The Emperor, after abolishing the feudal laws still extant in the empire, and emancipating the slaves, established compulsory free education throughout his dominions. As a result in another generation education will be as widespread in Abyssinia as in several European countries.
Menelik is himself an altogether unique figure among African potentates. As a diplomat, as a financier, and as a soldier, he can hold his own with the most up-to-date of his brother sovereigns. As a soldier and a diplomat, he showed his worth at the time of Italy’s defeat by the Abyssinians. In late years, however, it is particularly as a financier that Menelik has distinguished himself. He had a natural bent for finance, even as a young man, before his accession to the throne, and at that time went for stock speculation on the Paris Bourse to a considerable extent. These youthful speculations proved successful, and were only interrupted by the events which followed Menelik’s accession… The Abyssinian ruler has extended the range of his financial operations to the United States, and is heavy investor in American railroads. With  his American securities and his French and Belgian mining investments, Menelik has a private fortune estimated at no less than twenty-five million dollars.
The most striking fact about Abyssinia’s dusky ruler is his versatility. An accomplished linguist, he speaks French, English, and Italian fluently. Notwithstanding all the time he is compelled to devote to state affairs, he still finds the opportunity to keep up in current European literature, and is rarely at a loss when a new author is mentioned. At Adissaba Palace – to give him the title by which he is known to his subjects — he takes particular pride in his library of ten thousand volumes, collected by himself. Menelik’s chief hobby in the way of books are works dealing with the ancient civilizations of Africa and Asia.
Offering Menelik haters a square deal
I offer Menelik haters a square deal: If you stop lying about Menelik, I will stop telling the truth about Meles!
Professor Alemayehu G. Mariam teaches political science at California State University, San Bernardino and is a practicing defense lawyer.
Previous commentaries by the author are available at:
Amharic translations of recent commentaries by the author may be found at:

የህወሓት መፈክር፡ ‘የአማራ የበላይነት ይውደም!’ (በአብርሃ ደስታ)

OO
በአብርሃ ደስታ
ግርማይ ገብሩ የቀድሞ የህወሓት ታጋይና የአሁን የቪኦኤ (VOA) ዘጋቢና ደራሲ ነው። ዓላማዬ ስለ ግርማይ ገብሩ ለመፃፍ አይደለም፤ ግርማይ በፌስቡክ ገፁ ስላሰፈረው መረጃ ለመዋስ እንጂ። መረጃው ከዚህ በፊትም አውቀው ነበር። ግን ለማስረጃ ያህል ግርማይን ልጥቀስ: ምክንያቱም ግርማይ የህወሓት ታጋይ ነበርና።
ግርማይ በ1969 ዓም የህወሓት (ተሓህት) ሦስቱ መፈክሮች ሲጠቅስ የመጀመርያውና ዋነኛው አድርጎ የፃፈው “አፄነት፣ መስፍንነትና የአማራ የበላይነት ይወድማሉ” ይላል።
በትግርኛ “ካብ ጭርሖታት ህወሓት 1969 ዓም: ሃፀይነት፣ መስፍንነትን ናይ አምሓራ ዕብለላን ዓነውቲ እዮም!” ይላል። ግርማይ ገብሩ አልተሳሳተም። ከህወሓቶች ጋር የማልስማማበት ግን ነጥብ አለኝ።
እርግጥ ነው። እኔም አፄነትና መስፍንነትን እንደ ስርዓት አልቀበልም። ምክንያቱም አፄነትና መስፍንነት (እንደ ስርዓት) ላሁኗ ኢትዮጵያ አይመጥኑም። የአፄነትና መስፍንነት ስርዓት በኢትዮጵያ ታሪክ እዚ ግባ የሚባል ለውጥ አላመጣም። ስለዚህ እኛ የሚያስፈልገን ዘመናዊ (ከዘመኑ ንቃተ ህሊናችን ጋር አብሮ የሚሄድ) የህዝብ አስተዳደር (ዴሞክራሲ) እንጂ ንጉስነት (የሰው ገዢነት) አይደለም። የምንፈልገው የሕግ የበላይነት እንጂ የንጉስ የበላይነት አይደለም።
ግን አፄነትና መስፍንነት እንደ ስርዓት ባልቀበለውም የንጉሳውያን ቤተሰቦችና መሳፍንቶች መጥፋት አለባቸው ብዬ ግን አላምንም። እኔ ብሆን እነኚህ የንጉስ ቤተሰቦችና መሳፍንት ቁልፍ የመንግስት ስልጣን አልሰጣቸውም ነበር። በሀገራቸው በሰላም እንዲኖሩ ግን እፈቅድላቸው ነበር። ምክንያቱም እንደማንኛውም ሰው ዜጎች ናቸው፤ ለሀገራቸው በተቻላቸው መጠን አስትዋፅዖ አድርገዋል። ስለዚህ ንጉሳዊ ቤተሰብና መሳፍንት ስለሆኑ ብቻ መጥፋት አለባቸው ብዬ አልፈርድም። እንደ ጠላትም አላያቸውም፣ እንደ ዜጎች እንጂ።
ህወሓት ግን በመፈክር ደረጃ በጠላትነት ፈረጃቸው። በተግባርም አጠፋቸው፣ ገደላቸው። በንጉሳዊ ቤተሰብና መስፍንነት ዝንባሌዎች ሰበብ ብዙ የተምቤን፣ ዓጋመ፣ እንደርታ፣ ዓድዋ፣ ሽረ፣ አክሱም ወዘተ መሳፍንቶች እንዲጠፉ ተደረገ። ‘ትግራይ ከመሳፍንቶች ነፃ ወጣች’ ተባለ። እውነታው ግን ‘ትግራይ ተገደለች’ መባል ነበረበት። መሳፍንቶች ከስልጣን ማውረድ እየተቻለ መግደል ምን አመጣው (ህወሓቶች ከስልጣን ማውረድ እየተቻለ መግደል ለምን ያስፈልጋል)?
ባጠቃላይ መሳፍንቶቹ ሲወድሙ ትግራይ ወደመች። አሁን በትግራይ የተቃውሞ መንፈሱ የተዳከመው በመስፍንነት ሰበብ ብዙ ብቁ ሰው ስለተፈጀብን ነው የሚል እምነት አለኝ። በህወሓት የተገደሉብንን ያህን በሌላ ስርዓት አልተገደሉብንም። ስለዚህ መሳፍንቶች ከስልጣን በማውረድ (መሳፍንቶችን ሳይሆን መስፍናዊ ስርዓቱ) ከህወሓቶች ጋር እስማማለሁ። መስፍናዊ ስርዓቱ ለማጥፋት መሳፍንቶቹ ማጥፋት ከሚል የህወሓት መፈክር ወይ መርህ ግን አልስማማም።
ሌላውና መሰረታዊ የህወሓት ችግር “የአማራ የበላይነት ይውደም!” የሚል መፈክር ነው። እኔም ብሆን የማንም ሰው ወይ ብሄር ወይ ሌላ አካል የበላይነት አልቀበለም። የቴድሮስ ወይ ዮሃንስ ወይ ምኒሊክ ወይ ኃይለስላሴ ወይ መንግስቱ ወይ መለስ ወይ ኃይለማርያም ወይ አማራ ህዝብ ወይ ትግራይ ህዝብ ወይ ኦሮሞ ህዝብ ወይ ሌላ … የበላይነት አልቀበልም። እኔ የምቀበለው የበላይነት ‘የሕግ የበላይነት’ ብቻ ነው። የሌላ የማንም የበላይነት አልቀበልም።
እንደ ፖለቲካ ድርጅት አንድን ህዝብ ዒላማ አድርጎ መነሳት ግን ስህተት ብቻ ሳይሆን በሽታ ነው። ህወሓት (ተሓህት) የአማራን ህዝብ ዒላማ አድርጎ ሲነሳ፣ ሌሎች የህወሓት ተቃዋሚዎች ደግሞ በህወሓት ምክንያት የትግራይን ህዝብ ዒላማ ሲያደርጉ ዉጤቱ ምን ይሆናል? አንድን ህዝብ ከሌላ ህዝብ ጋር የማጣላት ስትራተጂ የፖለቲካ ዕብደት ነው። ህዝብና ገዢው መደብ አለመለያየት (አንድ እንደሆኑ አድርጎ ማሰብ) የፖለቲካ እውቀት ማነስ ዉጤት ነው። ስርዓቱ መቃወምና መታገል እየተቻለ ህዝብን ዒላማ አድርጎ በህዝቦች ላይ መተማመን እንዳይኖር መትጋትና በህዝቦች መካከል ጥላቻ እንዲነግስ መስራት ጠባብነት ነው።
አንድን ህዝብ የበላይነት ሊይዝ አይችልም። አንድን ቡድን ግን በአንድን ህዝብ ስም በመነገድ ሌሎችን ሊበድል ይችላል። የሰው የበላይነት (በህዝቦች ላይ) ሊተገብር ይችላል። ህዝብ እንደ ህዝብ ግን ሌላውን ህዝብ ሊበድል አይችልም። ህወሓት የትግራይን ህዝብ እንደሚወክል ይነግረናል። የትግራይን ህዝብ እወክላለሁ እያለ ሌሎች ህዝቦች (የትግራይን ጨምሮ) ይበድላል። ሌሎች ህዝቦች (የትግራይ ዉጭ ያሉ ኢትዮጵያውያን) ደግሞ በህወሓት ስርዓት ሲበደሉ በትግራይ ህዝብ የተበደሉ አድርገው ያስባሉ። ግን ስህተት ነው። መታረም አለበት። የትግራይ ህዝብ ለራሱ በህወሓት አገዛዝ የሚበደል ነውና።
“የአማራ የበላይነት” የሚባለው የህወሓት በሽታ እስካሁን ፈውስ አላገኘም። በመርህ ደረጃ ህዝብን ዒላማ አድርጎ ህዝብን ለመታገል መነሳት ስህተት ነው ብያለሁ። በፖለቲካ ህዝብን ዒላማ አይደረግም። ምክንያቱም የፖለቲካ ዓላማ ህዝብን ማገልገል እንጂ ህዝብን መጨቆን አይደለም። ስለዚህ ህዝብን የመበደል ዓላማ መያዝም መተግበርም የህሊና ወንጀል ነው። ህወሓቶች ይህን በሽታ (“የአማራ የበላይነት” መፈክር) አልተዋቸውም። አሁንም “ፀረ አማራ” እንቅስቃሴዎች አሉ። የህወሓት የአሁኑ ስትራተጂ “እኛ ከስልጣን የምንወርድ ከሆነ ከአማራ ጋር አብረን አንቀጥልም” የሚል ገንጣይ አስተሳሰብ እያራመዱ ይገኛሉ። “እኔ ከሌለሁ ሠርዶ አይብቀል …” ዓይነት ስትራተጂ መሆኑ ነው። በጣም የሚገርመው ነገር ፀረ ብአዴንም መነሳታቸው ነው። ለነሱ ከስልጣን ከሚወርዱ ኢትዮጵያ ብትበታተንና ትግራይን አስገንጥለው ትግራይን እየጨቆኑ ቢገዙ ይመርጣሉ።
ግን ይህን “አማራ” የሚባል ህዝብ መቼ ይሆን የበላይነት ይዞ ሌሎች ህዝቦችን የበደለው? አንድን ህዝብ እንዴት ሌላውን ህዝብ ይበድላል? ህዝብ ህዝብን ሊበድል አይችልም። ምክንያቱም አንድን ህዝብ ሌላውን ህዝብ መበደል ከጀመረ (ከቻለ) ህዝብ መሆኑ ቀርቶ ገዢ መደብ (elite) ሁነዋል ማለት ነው። ገዢ መደብ ከሆነ ደግሞ ህዝብ አይደለም። ገዢ መደብ ስርዓት ነው። ህዝብና ስርዓት ደግሞ ይለያያሉ።
ምናልባት የህዝብ የበላይነት አለ የምንለው ህዝብን የሚያስተዳደር (የሚገዛ) ስርዓት ከህዝቡ የወጣ ሲሆን ይሆን? ይህም አሳማኝ አይደለም። ምክንያቱም ገዢ ሁሌ ከህዝቡ ነው የሚወጣው (የቅኝ ግዛት ካልሆነ በስተቀየር)፤ ገዢ ከህዝቡ እንጂ ከማርስ አይመጣም። የኢትዮጵያ መሪ ከኢትዮጵያ ህዝብ ይወጣል። በኢትዮጵያ ብዙ ብሄሮችና ብሄረሰቦች አሉ። ስርዓቱ ከሁሉም ህዝቦች ሰዎች ይኖሩታል። መሪ ግን አንድ ነው የሚሆነው። ያ አንድ ሰው (መሪው) ከአንድ ብሄር ሊሆን ይችላል። ያ አንድ ሰው ስልጣኑ ተጠቅሞ ሌሎች ህዝቦችን ሊበደል (ወይ ሊጠቅም) ይችላል። ሰውየው የፈጠረው ስርዓት ለህዝቡ ቢጎዳም ቢጠምም ከስርዓቱ ይገናኛል እንጂ መሪው ከመጣበት ብሄር ጋር አይገናኝም። ስለዚህ ገዢዎች የሚወክሉት የፈጠሩትን ስርዓት እንጂ የመጡበትን ብሄር አይደለም።
የደርግ ስርዓት ሲበድለን፣ “አማራ በድሎናል” ይሉናል። የኃይለስላሴ ስርዓት ሲበድለን “አማራ በድሎናል” ይሉናል። የምኒሊክ ስርዓት ሲበድለን “አማራ በድሎናል” አሉን። የህወሓት ስርዓት ሲበድለንስ ማን በደለን ሊሉን ነው? የትግራይ ህዝብ? አይሆንም። ምክንያቱም የትግራይ ህዝብ የትግራይን ህዝብ ይበድላል? አንድን ህዝብ ራሱን ይበድላል? በደል ሁሉ ወደ አማራ ህዝብ ለምን? ስርዓትና ህዝብ ማገናኘት የፖለቲካ ኪሳራ ያስከትላል።
ግን እስቲ ይሁን፤ መሪዎች የመጡበትን ብሄር ይወክላሉ እንበል (ስህተት ቢሆንም)። እነሱ (መሪዎቹ) ሲበድሉ የመጡበት ብሄር በበዳይነት ተፈርጆ እንደ ጠላት ይቆጠር እንበል። የአማራ ህዝብ መቼ ይሆን በመሪዎቹ አድርጎ ሌሎች ህዝቦችን የገዛ (የበደለ)? ያለፉ ጨቋኝ ስርዓቶች አማራ ነበሩ ያለው ማነው? አማርኛ የተናገረ ሁሉ አማራ አይደለም። እስቲ የዘመናዊቷ ኢትዮጵያ መሪዎች እንመልከት።
ብዙ ግዜ የዘመናዊቷ ኢትዮጵያ ታሪክ የሚጀምረው ከአፄ ቴድሮስ ነው (ወይም ከዚሁ እንጀምር! ምክንያቱም ከአፄ ቴድሮስ በፊት ኢትዮጵያ በመሳፍንቶች ነበር የምትተዳደረው። በዘመነ መሳፍንት መሳፍንቶች የራሳቸውን ህዝብ (ብሄር) ይገዙና ይበድሉ ነበር)። “አማራ” ተብሎ ከተሰየመው አከባቢ የሚወለድ ገዢ ቴድሮስ ነው። አፄ ቴድሮስ ኢትዮጵያ አንድ ለማድረግ በዛን ግዜ የነበሩ መሳፍንቶች ተዋጉ። አፄ ቴድሮስ ዉግያው የጀመሩት በአማራ መሳፍንቶች (የጎጃም፣ ወሎና ጎንደር) ነበር። ቴድሮስ “ከአማራ ስለመጣሁ፣ አማራ ስለምወክል፣ የአማራ መሳፍንቶች ማጥፋት የለብኝም” አላሉም። (ህወሓት ለትግራይ መሳፍንቶች እንዳደረገው ሁሉ)። ስለዚህ አፄ ቴድሮስ አማራን ወክለው ሌላው ኢትዮጵያዊ አልበደሉም (ከበደሉም ለሁሉም ነው)። ስለዚህ “በአማራ ህዝብ ተገዛን” የሚለው ክስ “በአፄ ቴድሮስ ተገዛን” የሚል እንደማይሆን ተስፋ አደርጋለሁ።
የአማራ ተወላጅ የሆነ የኢትዮጵያ ገዢ ቴድሮስ ብቻ ነው ብዬ አስባለሁ (ጉዳዩ ለታሪክ ተመራማሪዎች ልተወው እንዳልሳሳት፤ ከተሳሳትኩ እታረማለሁ)። ዮሃንስ አማራ አልነበረም፣ ምኒሊክ አማራ አልነበረም፣ ኃይለስላሴ አማራ አልነበረም፣ መንግስቱ አማራ አልነበረም፣ መለስ አማራ አልነበረም፣ ኃይለማርያም አማራ አይደለም። ማነው አማራ?
ምናልባት “የአማራ ገዢዎች” የምንለው ግለሰቦቹ (ንጉሶቹና መሪዎቹ) ሳይሆን ስርዓቱ ነው ካልን ያው ስርዓቱማ ከሁሉም ህዝቦች ተወካዮች አሉበት። አማራ ለብቻው ገዥ ነበር ማለት አንችልም። ምናልባት ገዢዎቹ አማርኛ ስለሚናገሩ ነው ካልን ደግሞ አማርኛ የተናገረ ሁሉ አማራ አይደለም። አቶ መለስም አማርኛ ይናገር ነበር። አፄ ዮሃንስም አማርኛ ይናገሩ ነበር (አማርኛ የኢትዮጵያ ኦፊሽየላዊ የስራ ቋንቋ እንዲሆን የወሰኑት አፄ ዮሃንስ ናቸው የሚል መረጃ አለኝ፤ ‘መረጃ’ እንጂ ‘ማስረጃ’ አላልኩም)።
የአማራ ህዝብ እንደ ማንኛው የኢትዮጵያ ህዝብ በኢትዮጵያ ገዢዎች ሲሰቃይ የነበረ ነው። ባልበላበት በልተሃል፣ ባልገዛበት ገዝተሃል ሲባል ይገርማል፤ ልክ እንደ ትግራይ ህዝብ። የትግራይ ህዝብ ሳይበላ በልተሃል፣ ሳይገዛ ገዝተሃል ይባላል፤ ህወሓት በበላው፣ ህወሓት በገዛው። ህወሓት ትግርኛ ተናጋሪ ስለሆነ ከትግራይ ህዝብ ጋር የሚያገናኘው ነገር የለም (በፖለቲካ መልኩ)። ያለፉ ገዢዎች አማርኛ ስለሚናገሩ ከአማራ ህዝብ ጋር የሚያገናኛቸው ነገር የለም። ህዝብ ሌላ ገዢ ሌላ።
ባጭሩ ፀረ ህዝብ አቋም መያዝ ተገቢ አይደለም (ለማንኛውም ህዝብ)። ሰው የፈለገውን የፖለቲካ አመለካከት መያዝ ይችላል። “የቀድሞ ስርዓት አባላት …” ምናምን እያልን አንፈርጅ። የህወሓት አባላት ለሌሎች ሰዎች የቀድሞ ስርዓት አባላት፣ ናፋቂዎች ወዘተ እያላቹ ስትፈርጁ እናንተም ራሳችሁ ከህወሓት ስርዓት በኋላ “የቀድሞ ስርዓት አባላት ..” ምናምን እየተባላቹ ስማቹ ይጠፋል፣ የፈለጋችሁን የፖለቲካ ፓርቲ አባል የመሆን መብታቹ ይገደባል። አሁን በሌሎች ላይ የምትፈፅሙትን ስም የማጥፋት ተግባር በናንተ (በራሳቹ) ይፈፀማል።
ስለዚህ እናስተውል። ከጥላቻ ፍቅር ይሻለናል። ጥላቻ ይውደም። አሜን!